Monday, November 20, 2006

A VDH SLAM DUNK

Victor Davis Hansen, as always, has a perceptive and "right on the money" piece which summarizes much of what we've got to understand about any Iraq policy....but, he adds an answer to a question that's been on my mind for years, and it resonates truth. Read the whole thing.

Whatever the United States does is suspect; and journalists without responsibility for governance, either for setting policy or for its implementation, are always brighter than generals, politicians, and policy planners saddled with it.

The truth is that wealthy Western elites in the media have evolved beyond worry over the basics of their civilization. They are so insulated, even after September 11, that they don’t believe there is much connection between liberty, freedom, consensual government, freedom of expression, and the everyday mundane things they depend on — whether excellent medical care, clean water, nice cars, neat electronic gadgets, eating out, or safety in their streets. A nuclear Iran, a missile-laden North Korea, a theocracy in oil-rich Iraq, an unleashed terrorist-sponsoring Syria, and an emboldened Hezbollah — all these could still never quite take away their good life, so strong is the assurance of their never-ending comfort zone that they could not conceive of ever losing it. And thus the most vehement and angry critics find it possible, even desirable, to nibble away at their own civilization’s efforts, on the understanding that a loss in Iraq would be only an apparent loss.

That defeat would not entail any material detriment to themselves, but surely would enhance their own sense of contrarian self-righteousness and self-worth, as they boldly caricature the very culture that so empowered them.So yes, let us talk about sending more troops, or taking them out altogether, or cry about bad news coverage.
But the truth is that, if they were given more tactical leeway to go on the offensive, we would already have enough soldiers in Iraq to win a victory that even a hostile media will have to acknowledge and enemies watching must respect — but only if we persevere here at home in this latest climate of renewed hysteria.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Doc,

In WWII, the generals in charge of the heavy lifting were killers. Maybe a tad off kilter when juxtaposed with our military leadership now. These guys in charge now are politicians who need senators for promotions. It's been decided not to win. I cannot imagine Harry Reid looking George Patton in the eyes and saying anything. Mike Girard

9:07 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home